Should you buy singles at release, or wait out the supply wave? Every content creator has an answer and none of them has a table. We built one. For every English set released since late 2024 with full price coverage from launch, we indexed our set-level singles price to 100 on release week and tracked it daily. The bottom is real, it usually arrives between day 40 and day 90, and it averages about 25 percent off launch pricing. Except when it never comes at all.

The measurement

Ten launches, indexed from day zero

Set singles index from release week (release = 100)

SetReleasedTroughTrough dayDay 90Today
Prismatic EvolutionsJan 202599.32496.975.4
Journey TogetherMar 202561.08759.854.1
Destined RivalsMay 202598.710102.6105.7
Black BoltJul 202587.945102.7154.5
White FlareJul 202576.25282.8123.0
Mega Evolution (ME01)Sep 202552.48751.753.1
Phantasmal FlamesNov 202552.54066.873.9
Ascended HeroesJan 2026100.00131.6122.6
Perfect OrderMar 202679.19075.467.9
Chaos RisingMay 202646.95848.248.2 (day 60)

Two completely different animals live in this table, and telling them apart at launch is worth more than any other timing skill in the hobby.

Archetype one

The grinder: supply wins for two months

Journey Together, ME01, Phantasmal Flames, Perfect Order, Chaos Rising: ordinary sets follow the same script. Launch pricing holds for two or three weeks on opening hype, then the print wave lands and the index grinds down 21 to 53 percent, bottoming between day 40 and day 90. Buying these at release is the most reliably losing trade in the hobby. Buying the trough is not automatically a win either; note that ME01 sits at 53 a year later and Journey Together at 54. For grinder sets the trough is where you buy the specific cards you actually want, not where you speculate on the set recovering.

Archetype two

The chase set: there is no dip and waiting costs you

Prismatic Evolutions never gave buyers more than a 0.7 percent discount in its first 90 days. Destined Rivals bottomed 1.3 percent under launch on day 10 and was above launch by day 90. Ascended Heroes never traded below its release price at all and was up 31.6 percent by day 90. These sets share a profile: a headline chase card with mainstream pull, allocation problems at retail, and sealed prices that never approached MSRP. When a set launches already supply-constrained, the day 40 to 90 trough simply does not happen, and the waiting strategy that works everywhere else stops paying: by day 90 Ascended Heroes cost 31.6 percent more than at release and Destined Rivals 2.6 percent more, while Prismatic's day-90 buyer saved about three percent, against the twenty to fifty the grinders hand back.

The exception that paid

Black Bolt and White Flare: the trough plus a catalyst

The July 2025 twin sets are the best timing trade in the table. Both dipped on schedule, Black Bolt to 88 on day 45 and White Flare to 76 on day 52, and both then ran far above launch, to 155 and 123 today. Buying Black Bolt's trough returned 76 percent. The lesson is not that every trough recovers; the grinders above prove otherwise. The twins had what grinders lack: a finite, collectible hook, a complete national Pokédex split across the pair, that kept demand compounding after supply normalized. A trough is only a buy signal when there is a reason demand outlasts the print run.

Day 40-90where the bottom lands in every dipping setfour of four grinders with a full 90 days
−22%median trough depth across all ten launchesrange: 0% to −53%
1 of 10sets never traded below launchtwo more bottomed within 1.3%; all three were chase-led launches

The launches that wrote the rules

Zekrom ex
Zekrom exSV: Black Boltset index 88 → 155The trough-plus-catalyst trade: down 12% at day 45, up 55% over launch today.
Umbreon ex SIR
Umbreon ex SIRSV: Prismatic Evolutionstrough −0.7%The chase set that never blinked. Waiting never got cheaper than day one.
Mega Latias ex
Mega Latias exME01: Mega Evolutionindex 53 at day 301A grinder that never recovered. The trough was for buying cards, not the set.
Team Rocket's Mewtwo ex
Team Rocket's Mewtwo exSV10: Destined Rivalsday 90 index 103Above launch by day 90; the allocation profile predicted it at release.

Each set's index is moonstone's set-level singles price series (the average TCGplayer market across the set's tracked singles from our daily feed), rebased to 100 at the first data point on or after the set's release date, tracked through August 6, 2026. Surging Sparks (Nov 2024) is excluded because our series begins 80 days after its release, which would fabricate a launch baseline. Chaos Rising has only 60 days of history; its day 90 column reports day 60 and is excluded from trough-window statistics. Troughs are the series minimum within the first 90 days. Set-level indices average across singles and therefore understate individual chase-card moves in both directions. Correction, 2026-09-22, from an independent recomputation against production. Four rows print a Day 90 level below their own stated 90-day trough, which cannot happen, because the trough is the minimum of the window the Day 90 reading sits inside: Prismatic Evolutions (trough 99.3 at day 24, Day 90 printed 96.9), Journey Together (61.0 at day 87, printed 59.8), ME01 (52.4 at day 87, printed 51.7) and Perfect Order (79.1 at day 90, printed 75.4). Rebuilding the same series today at the same release anchors returns Day 90 levels of 99.7, 61.0 and 79.1 for the first, second and fourth; the troughs and trough days reproduce exactly in every row. ME01 cannot be rebased at all: our catalog holds no release date for it and its series opens on a coverage stub of $576 that jumps to $3,113 a week later, so treat that row as unverified. Two further qualifications this piece owed the reader. Prismatic Evolutions released January 17, 2025 and our set series begins January 27, so its 'release = 100' baseline is day 10, not release week, which is the same defect that got Surging Sparks excluded, at a tenth of the size; its launch-week mania is not in this index. And only Ascended Heroes never traded below its release price. Prismatic bottomed 0.7 percent under and Destined Rivals 1.3 percent under, so the count of sets that never dipped at all is one of ten, not three; the deck and the stat row said three and now say one.